The AIs list Instapage in 1 of 16 measured categories (best rank #2 in Landing page builders) and never surface it in the other 15.contested field
Because Instapage is not the top pick of any engine in a measured category yet, it has no consensus of its own to defend. That is the opening: the tools ranked above it are not stable picks either. In this dataset, across all 16 categories, no tool is the unanimous pick of all 8 engines. The disagreement is not noise to average away; it is the real state of your AI visibility, and it is what every single-number tracker quietly hides.
These are categories Instapage genuinely competes in, where the engines list it but put someone else first. This is the gap a buyer asking an AI sees before they ever reach your site.
| Category | Your rank | Ranked ahead of you |
|---|---|---|
| Landing page builders | #2 | Unbounce |
In these 15 categories, no measured engine surfaced Instapage at all. Some may be outside your market; the ones inside it are pure lost recommendation share.
Across all 16 categories, no single tool is the #1 pick of every engine. The "AI visibility" number a single-engine tracker shows Instapage is one engine’s view on one date; this report shows all 8.
This report is one dated capture, given to you at no cost. AI recommendations move every run and every week. The AI Visibility Tracker keeps score for you:
Each of 8 AI engines (Llama 3.3 70B via Groq, Cohere Command-A, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Llama 4 Scout, GPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.6) answered the same buyer questions across 16 B2B and go-to-market software categories. Every recommendation is a recorded model output, canonicalized and scored by position-weighted frequency. Capture window 2026-06-19 to 2026-07-08.
The full dataset is published open under CC-BY-4.0 with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20767878. This report states what the engines returned on the capture date. It does not judge product quality, and no vendor can buy a better number; the rankings are unpurchasable by design.